Did you wish a clarification, or would you like me to comment?
Yes, Mrs. Kusie, there are a couple of items from the book, The Power of Parliamentary Houses to Send for Persons, Papers & Records, which says that whether people are sworn in or not, under parliamentary privilege, it is still contempt of Parliament to mislead the committee by giving a false statement or false evidence, to refuse to provide information that has been requested...to questions or documents.
Moreover, on page 1081, House of Commons Procedure and Practice states the following:
Likewise, refusal to answer questions or failure to reply truthfully may give rise to a charge of contempt of the House, whether the witness has been sworn in or not.
Is that satisfactory for your point of order, or your question?