In evaluating a contract and its financial aspects, would it be a significant improvement and easier to say that having “sub-sub-sub-sub-subcontractors”—I'm exaggerating, but sometimes I feel like it's not such an exaggeration—is not profitable? If we award a contract to someone, we must not have two, three or four subcontractors. Would it be a solution to say that we're stopping this madness?
On November 7th, 2023. See this statement in context.