I would argue, Mr. Chair, that this has come through because of the allegation that there was misappropriate use of subcontractors' résumés and credentials in terms of obtaining the work.
However, from a contracting perspective, in our understanding this was a task authorization that was issued to a company that had a task-based contract. The task-based contract was for IT work, so it was a task authorization that was fairly general. It said that they were going to do feasibility work in the IT space under an IT contract. That task authorization didn't name who the resources were and it did not name Botler. It was only after they made the allegation that their résumés were used and put forth by GC Strategies that it came to light that there were these issues.