Yes, Mr. Chair.
I'd like some clarification, as well, because I think this is a bit confusing.
Paragraph (g) says, “the Chair be instructed to present a report to the House”. It is clear Mr. Johns is suggesting this be changed. I don't know that you would need to present a report to the committee, because the committee is aware this would be adopted. I think the right intention would be to remove paragraph (g), but I leave that to Mr. Johns.
Then there's paragraph (h), which refers to the same thing. It talks about what happens in the event the documents are not produced as ordered by the committee, then states this would then go to the House. It sounds to me as if Mr. Johns would like to reconsider this, in the event it is not done—not have it in this motion right now. There's also the amendment Mr. Johns proposed. It would also have to deal with paragraph (h).
I'd ask my colleague Mr. Johns to reread paragraph (g) and paragraph (h), and to provide some clarity as to what the amendment would do. It makes no sense to me that we wouldn't also be amending paragraph (h), because he was globally amending it to remove references to the House at this stage. We're not supposed to presume the documents won't come as the committee requested.
I leave that, again, to Mr. Johns to clarify.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.