Just on the point of order—and hopefully this is helpful—the rule regarding adjournment and then resumption is that if something happens in-between, you are allowed to move that dilatory motion again.
It makes sense because Mr. Johns didn't want to resume consideration of this because of what was happening at the time. Now events have happened. We have heard from officials, so now we're in a different time. That principle applies: You can adjourn debate and resume an hour later. Something has to happen in-between, but it doesn't have to be 48 hours. As long as something happens in between, that's allowed.
I hope that's helpful.
The motion is obviously in order and would be ruled that way by any chair of any committee who knows the rules.