Mr. Chair, I appreciate that, but I don't understand how you can rule that talking about protecting confidential information is not relative to an amendment that wants to protect confidential information. This is incredible. We're talking about the importance: Why is it important to protect confidential information in a manufacturing industrial setting? I'm hearing that it's not relevant to an amendment that's trying to protect confidential information...? What kind of Kafkaesque discussion are we having here? I don't understand.
On November 29th, 2023. See this statement in context.