What is the relevance to the motion, which is about the secrecy of the contracts and not about a dissertation from somebody else about the battery industry? The motion is not about the validity of the battery industry; it's about the secrecy. If the member could stick to the secrecy amendment he put forward and why he thinks it should be secret and not public in spending that money, it would be appreciated.
On November 29th, 2023. See this statement in context.