On the question from the honourable member, no, in short, that has not changed. It is industry practice for us to essentially coordinate benefits, as it's termed, between other programs if other coverage is available, and there are industry standard guidelines that dictate which coverage prioritizes others.
It was also one of the objectives of that enrolment process to collect good data and refresh all the data on where other coverage existed. It was one of the main objectives as people went through that process not only to confirm contact information, details around the members and dependents who might be covered, but also to make sure they would cite whether they had other coverage so that we could coordinate that seamlessly and automatically.
We did achieve some good objectives there in cleaning that up, and it was certainly to the betterment of members that we have accurate information on coordinating benefits.