Okay.
Sir, I have to say, with respect to this investigation in general, that our goal at this committee is just to find out what actually happened. It's to get to the truth. People with nothing to hide should be able to give us frank and clear answers. What makes me and I think many members of the public even more suspicious about what's gone on in the context of this procurement is that we have witnesses give obviously absurd answers.
To Mr. Brock's question, you couldn't distinguish.... You said you fibbed about something and then you said it wasn't a lie. Then, here, you're telling me that you did send a text. The text you sent claims to have explicit knowledge of what happened inside the Deputy Prime Minister's office. You're saying you didn't have that knowledge that you claimed to. Now you're saying, well, it was because you were describing a hypothetical scenario.
You weren't engaged in some kind of cosplay game. You were telling your client what you claimed to know was happening, and you're telling us you didn't know what was happening. How am I to make sense of this?