Actually, it's one of those very unexpected reports in which there was actually good news for the government. Even though we disagreed with the government's findings of needing to build 500,000 homes per year, our conclusion was that it needed to build fewer homes to return to the target, so there's less of a challenge than originally anticipated.
One of the key things we identified was that if you built all of those homes, based on the historical structure of the housing market you would have a vacancy rate north of 10%, so one in every 10 homes would be empty. That would be unprecedented and could arguably result in a situation wherein there's significant downward pressure on housing prices.