I don't know. It wasn't a presentation. It was still relatively early days. They indicated that they were in the midst of consulting with others. I don't know where they're ultimately going to end up.
We provided feedback to them, consistent with the observations I made today. One observation I made was that it might be easier to use the approach of the U.K. They could also take Toronto's or Quebec's. Another was that when you're redefining terms that parliamentarians haven't seen, it has the potential to create additional uncertainty, because people haven't seen them previously. There's also the importance of having a fiscal anchor.
Based on what's currently being considered, regardless of how you split the funding allocations and what buckets you put them into, the most important aspect is whether the nation's finances are sustainable. Those are the considerations that we highlighted to them.