To go back to a point I made earlier, I think the first aspect is how the terms are actually defined. We currently have definitions of “operating capital” that show up in the budget—people are familiar with it—and they show up in the public accounts, audited by my counterpart, the Auditor General of Canada. If these terms are defined differently to mean different things, there obviously ends up being a risk that people end up being confused, or the terms end up being conflated, even though they mean slightly different things. That's obviously a risk and something we're going to pay attention to. It's something that the Department of Finance and the government are aware of.
I was appointed by the Prime Minister, and I don't need to make his arguments for him, but potentially, someone taking more time to come up with a comprehensive and well-thought-out definition of what “operating” and “capital” look like before rolling out a new definition and a new way of presenting things isn't a bad thing.