You're right about this report. We highlighted what I would say is a lack of clarity in their reporting. CMHC is still leading other projects, but those homes were counted in another project and then counted again here because land was added to the projects through the lands initiative. While that might be how you want to get to your 4,000 commitments, I think you just need to be clear. That's why we made some recommendations around a project being delayed and so on. That kind of information is useful.
My biggest concern in this area is around how they're measuring success. They're measuring success based on commitments, which is a great benchmark to get to, but those buildings are not ready for occupancy, and people who need affordable housing are going to be waiting longer than 2027 or 2028 to be able to move in.