Mr. Chair, since I don't have much time, I will summarize.
We were to study three reports: the report on the acquisition of F‑35 fighter jets, the report on vacant federal office space that needs to be used urgently, and the report on GC Strategies contracts. I will summarize what I have understood, and you can add recommendations in a few seconds.
First, with regard to the subcontracting of GC Strategies contracts, it is not only a matter of accountability and not paying for a service before it is delivered, but security clearances must also be considered. I have heard that it is important to verify the security clearance of subcontractors. When it comes to accountability, it's about providing clarity and evidence so that you can do your job well.
You also mentioned that there are rules. You asked whether, if we forget what has happened in recent years and focus on the present, we could explore, streamline and formulate the rules in the simplest way possible so that all public servants can comply with them.
You also talked about risk assessment. That leads me to say that when we advertise, we need to show what we are looking for through an implementation plan and not be reactive by saying that we did not anticipate certain things. That's basically what I understood, because we could be here for hours.
Are there other aspects we should be vigilant about and pay attention to?