Thank you everyone for your intriguing contribution to this subject. You know that we're exploring what an effective means would be for the government to look at the emerging issues, with diagnosis, treatment and prevention. You can go off on all these different paths for each of those intriguing things. I appreciate the spirit of collaboration, and you understand how important that is in how we get what we know to trickle down.
My first question will be for the CSA. Maybe everyone would like to weigh in on this.
We know that our protective equipment, as we have it today, even as up to date as it is, doesn't reduce all the risks. As a matter of fact, this committee has heard that sometimes it makes athletes more vulnerable to serious injury—this gladiator effect, or this idea that you're invincible or that someone has this equipment on and can take a certain kind of hit.
We can get into whole social theories of sport and all that stuff, but how do you think we proceed and balance that? What possibly could the context be? How could we measure and get a handle on both of those phenomenons? What do you suggest or see from your past experiences as a way that we should be moving forward?