Thank you for the question.
There are two main vectors in harmonization: the sport community, and provincial and territorial governments. That is why national sport organizations have told us they needed support in the process from provincial and territorial governments. They were not really talking about financial resources. That is not what they meant. They were really talking about tools, by which we mean education tools, return-to-play protocols, key messages and prevention, as well as awareness messages on what should be done when a concussion occurs.
So harmonization lies in those practices. That is where the issue was when the working group began operating. The issue is on a downward trend, but it still exists. There are always new tools, and it is clear that people want to do the right thing. They want to develop tools that will benefit the community the most. However, our fundamental principle has always been that the development of those tools depends on scientific research, which is evolving considerably and at lightning speed. So it is a matter of ensuring that research bears fruit, influences the health field, which, in turn, influences the sport sector. We can then disseminate those tools through different networks. So it is truly our anchor.