It's a big question. Let me make a few comments in response. One is that the funding you saw on page 4 is for all obesity research, everything from trying to understand the genes that play a role in determining obesity to working with communities in ways that will help communities to find approaches that work for them and to understand whether the approaches work. So it's the sum total, and it's far too little, given the size of the problem.
There's a long delay between when one starts research and when you get the results and then when their impact actually happens. One of the biggest issues, really, is to close the gap between knowledge development and knowledge transfer. That's something I go back to; that when you work with communities that are trying to develop programs, you are really communicating and transferring knowledge. In those bar graphs, there are even grants that Dr. Katzmarzyk has gotten from us to help us understand the magnitude of the problem. His work isn't necessarily going to solve the problem; it's going to bring it to your attention first, and then we have to work with communities and community groups and in partnership with our other health portfolio partners to ensure that when we seed communities with health promotion funding they actually are understanding the impact of their activities.
Does that address your question adequately?