Can I offer a quick response on the better data question? I think that's an important one, certainly.
There are two areas around data that are important. One is surveillance. We don't have very good surveillance in this country. Not only is this the first national nutrition survey in 35 years, but we don't even measure heights and weights very often. I think that's really important. It isn't even just about body weight; it's also about surveillance of food and physical activity behaviours, and it's about surveillance of policies that have an effect. That's important.
The other aspect of data collection that I think is important is to support more community-based research and even community alliances for research, where you have researchers working with communities for which this is an issue and the communities play a significant role in the whole process of articulating what their needs for information are, the researchers working with them to get that information in a coherent way and feeding it directly back to those communities, as well as to the greater pool. Those are the kinds of key things we need to do and the kinds of things we have done, albeit in a limited way, through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.