If consumers are buying food and they're trying to figure out how healthy it is, at this point in time what they have to do is look at that label. That doesn't make any sense to a lot of people. It's very difficult to understand. If consumers want to decide how to make healthy choices, we ought to make it easier for them to do that. And one of the ways to do that is what you're talking about.
I believe there is a blue brand that you can buy at the Superstore, or something like that, that's supposed to be healthy. This is helping consumers decide, when they buy food, how healthy it is. That should be enough. If you're interested in the health of the family, it should allow consumers to look at that thing and make up their minds. The most important part of it, though, is that it should give them a good idea that the food that they're actually buying truly is healthy and it should make it easy for them to do so. They shouldn't have to run around and look at all the backs of things to try to figure out how healthy a meal is going to be. So I would support that.
The only issue I would have is with how close that is to their health. As I understand it, this can change over time. There's the good fat and the bad fat; there's the good cholesterol and the bad cholesterol. We learn these things over time. The best science we have now may not be actually promoting the best health that they can get. I'm hoping that will be correlated over time, but it could be a problem. That needs to change, and I don't know how they would weight them and things like that.