Let the clerk explain that. One is a procedural motion. That's the only reason it was introduced without notice of motion. But yours had notice of motion.
Is that right?
On October 17th, 2006. See this statement in context.
On October 17th, 2006. See this statement in context.
October 17th, 2006 / 5:20 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Rob Merrifield
Let the clerk explain that. One is a procedural motion. That's the only reason it was introduced without notice of motion. But yours had notice of motion.
Is that right?
See context to find out what was said next.