I'll clarify that. We had one working session during the first session back in September, and then we did not discuss future business and what we would go with until the last meeting. This is why Ms. Davidson never had an opportunity to bring it forward. That meeting, if you remember, was cut short at the end because there was quite a heated discussion about this issue. So really there has only been one time when we've talked about it, which was the last time, and now this time.
It's done in the form of a motion. I believe Ms. Davidson is trying to do it that way so that we can just get to a conclusion rather than into discussion on it, because we've debated it considerably. So we either say yes or say no. I think it's very simple.
So if I see no other debate on this issue, then—