Let me start with the last one. No, there aren't, but it's a very interesting suggestion.
The first question was about why we are revising the food guide. In fact, we didn't enter into that lightly. We actually did a very comprehensive review of the 1992 food guide to assess, one, whether it was still solid in terms of the new dietary reference intake material; and two, whether it was a food guide that was performing to the degree that people understood what its messages were.
We had quite a comprehensive review, and through that review we heard there were many challenges. It was because of the many challenges that people had in understanding; because we had the new work out of the Institute of Medicine, the dietary reference intake work; because there was new science that looks at associating foods, food patterns, chronic disease outcome—for all of those reasons—that we initiated the revision of Canada's Food Guide.
How do we compare to other countries? We look at the food guides of other countries. I've brought a couple of the graphics along with me. We anchor very closely to ask how we compare, say, to the U.S. and their food pyramid. I would say there are many similarities and there are many differences, and I'd like to think we're improving on what other countries have done. We have learned from some of the feedback that has been given around the food patterns that have been issued. That's what is leading us to try to strengthen this particular iteration.
Janet, do you have anything?