Well, as a member of the committee, I am not suggesting that having this information means we're going to start rewriting the food guide from square one. But it is clear that there have been some questions that have been raised by a number of people along the way. This will either reassure some people that some areas they're concerned about were covered, or if there's something absolutely glaring for people and there are enough people who think that there's a glaring piece missing that's been raised by witnesses and is also of concern to committee members, it can be flagged.
Perhaps people can have that part of the discussion, or see if indeed the piece about aboriginal people, or whatever, is reflected in the kind of respectful way that people would like, or includes that.
I don't think anybody is suggesting we should try to rewrite the food guide, because we're a bunch of folks who couldn't do that. But we are politicians, we do listen to people in our communities, and for all I know it may reassure people and they may never raise it again.