If the committee would allow the chair, I just have one quick question on this, because this is the deal. We have the Canola Council saying let's not regulate, and we have the other side saying let's regulate. But I am wondering, since we're seeing such a change in the marketplace--consumers are moving away from transfats if they know they're there and if they identify them--would a solution for the committee be to have in its report that a significant label that is easily identifiable by consumers would be put on a product if it had transfats in it so consumers would have knowledge of the choices they're making? I am wondering if that would be an option that you'd see as being plausible.
On November 2nd, 2006. See this statement in context.