Thank you, Mr. Chair.
My thanks to everybody who has come today.
I want to use an example that Bernadette used, but I think it is not uncommon to other people who have spoken at the table. On a scale of one to ten, I'd like to know how big a problem it is, although I may be able to answer without doing it.
You talked about the fact that the funding for one of the programs was a six-month funding, and now you've received information that you can get more funding for six months. Very often, it's project funding and it's six months. Quite frankly, it's impossible to do a six-month program without knowing if you're going to have six months after that, because you'd design it differently. I'm interested in knowing—and not only from you, but from anybody who wants to answer—whether the six months and six months is based on goals that you have set. Is that based on benchmarks that have been set either by you or by the federal government? Is it based on the outcome of whether you've met those benchmarks or have moved toward those benchmarks? Or is it just kind of six months' funding, which is a huge problem in terms of implementing any kind of a coherent program at all for anybody?