I'm certainly not flippant enough to say I know how long and how much in particular, but I will say a lot of work has been done in some of that regard over the past year and a bit. We've been looking at some of the structural changes that might need to be made to our education system, to our housing systems, and to other systems, to make the investments where they need to be made, certainly in a first nations, Métis, and Inuit context, with the Kelowna process and aboriginal round table process that occurred. Our concern, frankly, and the other side of that, is that we need to have an urban action plan, which hadn't been contemplated in that process.
I think there are two timelines that we need to consider. The first is that any immediate investment in children will pay off in this generation. If you wait another mandate, if you wait another ten years, then the next generation will benefit. I think that's the first answer. Kids not being hungry at night, kids having access to quality food and programming, can have an immediate impact.
I think the longer-term issues, with the broader health in our communities, is going to take a better collaboration between the first nations, Métis, and Inuit governments and the Government of Canada, and a broader action plan with the provinces to deal with the cities.
I don't think that's an answer for you, but certainly from my perspective, when we sit down and look at how to make these changes, that's the kind of landscape and timeline that we see.