I'm not speaking in general now. I made my point about “in general”. I'm speaking of this specific product. For instance, you know that one of the first things you try to do is this: first do no harm.
Right now, in Vancouver, we have turbidity in the water. There has been no one sick yet, but they're still continuing to advise you to boil water, because that is a precautionary principle.
Given that this product had shown itself to be a dangerous product at the beginning, and given that some of the repercussions of it were very damaging to women particularly, I just think that in this instance the mandatory reporting of any adverse effects, on a regular basis, as soon as they occur, should have been there. And I believe that if the physician doesn't do it when he or she was asked in this instance to do mandatory reporting, then that's going to be the physician's problem to deal with. But I think Health Canada has a duty, with a product that has been shown to be harmful, to take that precautionary principle in this instance.