As was also highlighted earlier, I think there's a very interesting conflict with the 2002 guidelines, which are explicitly referenced in the act. I believe it means the 2002 CIHR guidelines are the guidelines that are relevant to the legislation. It creates a very interesting legal dilemma because you have a set of guidelines that were created by a relatively ad hoc committee, which both Françoise and I sat on, and became incorporated into law without the knowledge that it was in fact what was going to happen.
In the document that we both participated in, we said it was a living document and that they may be changed in the future. Nevertheless, the legislation explicitly references 2002. If you move forward to the amendments that occurred, it clearly seemed to try to clarify that you can use fresh embryos.
I was not closely involved in the amendments, but they seem to be a clarification on the use of fresh embryos. Is it appropriate? Is that what you're asking me?