Permit me to say that the commission does an economic analysis and it does a health and safety analysis. On the economic side, whether it's a trade secret to begin with and is deserving of protection, in the nineteen years that the commission has existed, with all the claims that have been made to the commission, the industry has only demonstrated non-compliance with the economic filings in four claims. They've always demonstrated 99.99% of the ability to meet the economic criteria to prove it's a trade secret.
I think your question goes to the health and safety side. We are not permitting any withholding of any health and safety information. They have to fully disclose and provide all the health and safety information. That frequently goes down into scientific studies on toxic ingredients, the LD50 studies, the tests that have been applied in animals to achieve certain scientific conclusions.
To the extent that we are permitting the industry to withhold some data, it's economic. There has to be absolutely full, 100% disclosure and provision of the health and safety data to the commission for review.