We certainly don't advocate abandoning the Canadian nutrition facts panel. It's very important. It provides a lot of useful information for consumers that are interested in the details. Both the Swedish keyhole system and the Hannaford Bros. experiment, if you want to call it that, have features that are desirable. Obviously the Swedish example was established by government, so it has a little more credibility, I guess, and so acceptance of it may be broader.
The Hannaford Bros. approach actually rates virtually all of the processed foods in the store, which is an advantage over the other systems, over the U.K. system or the Swedish system. Consumers can see which foods have unfavourable designations and which ones have favourable designations, and they can make the decision on the basis of both types of information.