In the discussions between what was passed in the fall and where we are today with these proposed amendments, can you tell us some of the people who...? Is this unanimous in the public health community, or would this committee be able to find witnesses, other than you as officials, who would speak to both sides of this issue?
If we were comfortable, we would just move on. The original consultation on the Quarantine Act with the community was very tiny--one meeting in Edmonton. Would we find that the public health community...?
I mean, this committee will make a decision. If we make a decision to go with it, do we end up with Richard Schabas and the whole world screaming at us tomorrow? Is it absolutely unanimous in the public health community that you don't need this dumb stuff on land conveyances, or are we in the middle of a mess?