Thank you very much. I think it will be pretty instructive when we get the answer to my question about the amount spent on anti-smoking and then we can compare the two. I think you'll find that what is spent on this is absolutely minuscule, comparatively speaking. Look at the success we've had with the anti-smoking campaign and the second-hand smoke and all those kinds of things. If you put in the money, you get the impact.
But I wanted to go back to Dr. Butler-Jones. He kept talking about how resources and allocation of responsibilities are a political decision, a cabinet decision. I think you can hear around the table that we find it pretty frustrating that there's some money here and there's some money there, and different people are in charge of that money. I always find when responsibility is shared, nobody is really responsible.
So I want to ask Dr. Butler-Jones, considering that this has a great deal to do with disease prevention and health promotion, is that the vision he has for the agency? I know the agency's new, it's just growing, and you have to grow at a rate that is manageable. But 20 years from now, do you envisage a public health agency in Canada that is something like the Surgeon General's office in the United States, which is responsible for leading the charge in public education? Even its website is tremendously impressive.
Is that what you see for yourself eventually, that all the prevention-promotion activities will come under the Public Health Agency and your role will be somewhat like that of the Surgeon General?