Basically, where we're at now is looking at tracking value in change in terms of diagnostic behaviour; use of guidelines; levels of surveillance; the number of organizations that are engaged; the tracking, the polling that we've done in terms of public awareness. Is there more that could be done? Absolutely. But with the resources, we tend to focus on trying to get the activities based on value for money recognized in terms of practices elsewhere, where studies have been done, and applying them in Canada, as opposed to tracking them here.
Certainly in the future, both through CIHR and some of the things we're doing, looking at returns on investment is obviously key, but given the evidence that exists elsewhere, with limited resources we'll focus it on the activities rather than the other.