We have a high degree of concordance. In fact, what I was told is that in all cases but one we had accepted the recommendation of the common drug review, and when I asked what that one was and the reasons for it, I was told the original recommendation was to not list. British Columbia looked at it and thought there might be some specific criteria that could be applied for a patient to receive the drug. Subsequently, the common drug review relooked at it and identified specific criteria.
So I feel that we have in fact followed the recommendations in 100% of the cases.