Evidence of meeting #51 for Health in the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was cdr.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Debbie Milliken  Director, Provincial Drug Reimbursement Programs, Cancer Care Ontario
William Hryniuk  Director and Past Chair, Cancer Advocacy Coalition of Canada
Jennifer Knox  Oncologist, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital
Diana Ermel  President, Canadian Breast Cancer Network
Barry Stein  President, Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada
Jackie Manthorne  Executive Director, Canadian Breast Cancer Network

5:30 p.m.

Oncologist, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital

Dr. Jennifer Knox

We have in some areas. We wrote a consensus statement on the treatment of colorectal cancer. The west coast met and the east coast met, and we independently came up with almost identical documents. It's out there and it's been published. I'm leading a group now in which we are going to have a national consensus on kidney cancer.

We haven't always had to do that because we haven't been challenged with the problems of the cost until recently. I think it behooves us to try to do it more.

I think it's quite possible and easy for us to get consensus on it. We do it in the hope that it's going to lead to funding. That being said, all the other issues really need to be addressed so something can come of it.

5:30 p.m.

Director and Past Chair, Cancer Advocacy Coalition of Canada

Dr. William Hryniuk

You can write guidelines all you want. But if you don't monitor to see whether or not they're being adhered to and, if not, why they're not adhered to, there's no sense in writing national guidelines.

In B.C., they write guidelines, and they watch the monitoring. They see where there's no adherence and close that loop.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Merrifield

Very good. Thank you.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Brown Liberal Oakville, ON

But would it not be easier to get public will behind national funding standards for these drugs, if there were in fact national practice guidelines the practitioners agreed to?

Let's face it, if there were guidelines, patients would demand that doctors in their jurisdictions use those guidelines and that provincial governments pay for the drugs those guidelines implied.

5:30 p.m.

Director and Past Chair, Cancer Advocacy Coalition of Canada

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Brown Liberal Oakville, ON

In some ways, the ball is then in your court, is it not?

5:30 p.m.

President, Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada

Barry Stein

I don't think it's within the court of patient advocates to decide public policy.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Brown Liberal Oakville, ON

No, I didn't say that. I'm talking about oncologists coming to some level of agreement.

5:30 p.m.

Director and Past Chair, Cancer Advocacy Coalition of Canada

5:30 p.m.

President, Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Brown Liberal Oakville, ON

It would carry a tremendous amount of weight with patients, governments, and voters.

5:30 p.m.

Director and Past Chair, Cancer Advocacy Coalition of Canada

Dr. William Hryniuk

If you encouraged us to do it through the mechanism of CPAC, it would work.

5:30 p.m.

President, Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada

Barry Stein

The truth of the matter is we've had guidelines. I alluded to some in Quebec by way of example. It's no different from any other province, and the drug is still not funded. It's not a guarantee.

5:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bonnie Brown Liberal Oakville, ON

You have to pressure one province against the other.

5:30 p.m.

President, Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada

Barry Stein

We're trying.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rob Merrifield

Thank you, Ms. Brown.

Thank you to the witnesses.

It's been very interesting, and the questions equally so. We want to extend our thanks to you for coming to testify before the committee. We consider this to be an important subject.

With that, I'll call the meeting adjourned until next time.