Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have to say I speak with some bias. I'm from British Columbia, and I was the health minister. I am a woman from B.C. surviving after breast cancer, so I appreciate that. I was in the very fortunate position to be in that province during that time.
It wasn't a question I was going to ask, but now I'm really puzzled. I'll probably ask it another time, but I didn't realize the names of committees were not public. I cannot think, other than of one particular example of medical treatment in our country, where anybody's life has ever been put at risk because their names were published. I think we all know what that one was, but I'm somewhat startled by that. I don't need that explanation today, but I will pursue that because I'm a little bit...well, a lot astounded by it.
I would like to know, if we were to rely on the information gathered by other jurisdictions without then redoing that information, would there have to be some--and somebody said harmonization, but I don't think they meant around this--kind of trust and harmonization in the way that information is gathered? People gather information in a variety of ways. Is it possible to do it so jurisdictions would gather information in ways in which different jurisdictions would have confidence?
Could someone comment on that, please? I have two more questions, so not a long answer, please.