I understand that in certain countries—and I would just like to know more about it—there are places where the people who know the most about these things, the patients and the providers, come together to decide in an inclusive decision-making process where they feel comfortable with the international evidence and the other reality. They are then prepared to make things available. I also think that we would want it moved, then, to the real-world ongoing tracking of what happens when it's out there, as to whether it works or doesn't work and whether it's cost-effective, but you make that decision, then.
Are you comfortable with a system in which there would be much more input from stakeholders and patients as to whether they're prepared to accept the risk and the evidence? How would you design something? I guess Michael had a go at saying, but if you guys were writing the recommendations for our report, what would they say?