Mr. Lexchin, you conducted a study that gave you some results. The CDR process did not seem satisfactory to you. You made comparisons with Australia, among other countries, and you are coming to the conclusion that the CDR is effective or adequate in terms of evaluation time and program efficiency. You also came to the conclusion that it was comparable to other countries' processes, that the same results were obtained, and that we have no more or no fewer products.
I would like to bring you back here, to Canada. You did not conduct a comparison with Quebec. In Quebec, more products are on the market and less time is taken. Perhaps it is because of financial or human resources, but I would like to know why Quebec works better. It is held up as a model. You went all the way to Australia to find out that the evaluation processes are similar.
I am anxious to read your evaluation to understand your approach, because there are some holes in what you said.