Thank you.
My sense is that the expertise should be as broad as possible. I limit my comments to mental illnesses, but mental illnesses are so pervasive that I think the need for expertise is apparent to anyone, other than the people who appoint people to CEDAC.
I think the reality is that if they're going to advise appropriately, they must be experts in the field. As far as I'm concerned, they must have significant expertise. It exists in Canada, from the scientific level down to the community level, and it should be accessed. Also, I think expertise should be accessed as the drug moves through various approval phases.