Thank you.
For some reason this conversation, or the whole discussion, is much bigger than I understand. We're talking about a piece of legislation with wording saying there is a duty to notify the nearest public health officer, or the nearest...whatever it says. It's not that there's to be a quarantine officer at every crossing—not anything like that—just a duty to notify the nearest public health officer, or whatever it says. So why we would feel this need to take it out is a bit beyond me. I am puzzled about why this discussion has grown this big and why we would just not leave it there, since we are not talking about the resources, we're not talking about a quarantine officer, but just about leaving the current wording that there's a duty to notify the nearest person, period.