Yes. We encourage the approach, as I mentioned earlier, through progressive licensing.
One area where again we should be cognizant, because the resources are limited and the data necessarily has to be large, is that we need to ensure that whatever we do will be Canadian regulation, structured in a different way but so that ultimately the standards that will be required for post-marketing are somehow homogeneous, so that the questions that are being raised through post-marketing trials are valid scientific questions with a very clear outcome.
There are epidemiological methodologies now that require scientific discussion. As I mentioned earlier, good science is not the prerogative for any group, and that's why we encourage the spirit of transparency and collaboration. ICH is a forum; CIOMS is a forum. There are all kinds of international fora to ensure that we are all aligned.