Well, in the case of, say, Evra, the patients weren't advised. So lawsuits were entered into, because serious harm and death happened, because there wasn't that information.
So why wouldn't we then, if we're going to enter into this risk management model, err on the side of telling all? Say there are problems with this drug in certain circumstances. Be up front about it from your end, from Health Canada's end, and from the doctor's end, as opposed to waiting and seeing what the science is. Why don't we accept the science and practise the “do no harm” principle?