Thank you, Madam Chair.
To follow up on what my colleague Mr. Tilson was touching upon, I have a question for Dr. Abrams.
In a press release on December 13, the Canadian Society of Nuclear Medicine expressed pleasure and relief that Parliament “has taken a strong and balanced approach in assessing the risks of operating the Chalk River facility versus the risk to Canadians of not having access to essential medical diagnostic and therapeutic services”.
I want to get your opinion. If we didn't have that day in Parliament, what would have arisen? Do you think that was the correct approach today, as you did when the Canadian Society of Nuclear Medicine expressed that opinion on December 13?