Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thanks to all of you for your presentations today.
Let me start with Ms. Gillham-Eisen.
You just said there's nothing in all of this to prevent people from donating their organs, yet it seems to me that the way this whole exercise was done has precisely that effect. It discourages people from offering their organs for donation and leaves a bad taste in many people's mouths on top of that, in the sense that they feel they're being discriminated against.
Was it done this way to in effect achieve a ban but avoid a charter challenge?