Yes. I'm certainly in favour of having more information sooner rather than less. I'm not familiar with the exact process, but if they wait until it's published somewhere to have the information, I think that's too long. There should be some mechanism by which the appropriate agencies internationally exchange this information, perhaps even at the early stages. Unfortunately, if they wait until it is published, even if it's in professional publications, then it takes a long time. Then, too, we run into the situation of the media picking up on these things and incorrectly reporting so much of this information, because they aren't equipped to interpret it or they don't read through to the end, where it says something quite different from what the heading seemed to say. None of that serves the public well at all.
Also, perhaps there should be some requirement for researchers, if they stumble across something that should be known.... I think of the Nancy Olivieri case several years ago, in which she basically broke the terms of her contract but felt that she had to do so in the public interest. There needs to be some mechanism by which somebody like that would in fact be required to submit that information and not be penalized or vilified for it. She was subsequently, at least, exonerated.