Okay.
I want to support the motion. I had also a motion on the books that I do not need to proceed with; it was only there as a way to advance the work of this committee on the two sessions we held with respect to organ donations.
I hear what the parliamentary secretary is saying. While this whole issue may not be about deliberate discrimination, by implication it sends the wrong message for the wrong reasons. We know that annex E of the document is in fact exclusionary, and it is in regulations.
The U.S. model would be a far more appropriate model to follow if Mr. Fletcher is concerned about that being the example. These are guidelines; they are not exclusionary and they are not in the regulations.
I think the motion makes sense in terms of sending appropriate messages to our community and to Canadians everywhere that we want to see people sign their donor cards without restriction, knowing that there is a good process in place. We don't in any way have to practise anything that would appear to be discriminatory by any stretch of the imagination and send the wrong message to the gay community.