Allow me to respond in a few words.
As I said in my speech, it is important to make a decision that takes into account the opinions of scientists, of course, but also public policy. I said that various opinions were given by the scientific community. My conclusion is that public policy, on the other hand, is clear.
From our perspective, it's the combination of reviewing the sciences, as Dr. Butler Jones so aptly put it, and combining it with public policy that gets you to a decision about the health and safety of Canadians. That's the same method used by me, and I dare say by other ministers over the years. That's how we come up with positions.
With respect to Insite, there's a court decision and we are going to respect it. If it is overturned, then it's a different story. But if it is not overturned, the decision of our courts trumps the decision of legislators as well as the decision of parliamentarians, the decision-makers on Parliament Hill. I respect that. It's the way the system is. I was explaining to you how I make decisions based on science plus public policy—it's a combination of those. In this case, my best advice is that the science is mixed, but the public policy is clear. That's my perspective.