There are ways—and this is something, again, for the committee to look at—to clearly signal the intent. I've said it, and not only in terms of the draft regulatory framework. If there is a willingness on the part of the committee and the government to look at wording that will make the intent clearer than it is now, personally, I have no issue with that. All the statements and concerns we have heard we understand. For the vast majority, I would agree with ensuring that we address them through the regulations. We had set out to do it through regulations. The question now is a legislative one: What fits in the act versus what fits in the regulations?
On March 12th, 2009. See this statement in context.