The trouble for us and for the witnesses who have been before us is that we have to take your word. I may trust you, Dr. Butler-Jones, and believe you have integrity on the job, but you might not be there forever. The regulations are something that cabinet approves. We don't know how they may be changed by the political powers that may be.
So we're interested in making sure that as much as possible the concerns of these folks are reflected in this legislation. They say that the way it now sits, they're going to lose research and they're going to experience some of what happened in the States with the Patriot Act. Some of the witnesses remarked that MIT had lost researchers because of the restrictions. I think the last thing we want to do is lose the little bit of leeway we have in this country around innovative research. Wouldn't it be better to actually follow the U.K. model of having a registry, as opposed to taking this tougher regulatory licensing approach?