I have a couple of other topics, but thank you very much for that. I know that the practitioners and the associations are very interested in seeing more government-supported research, and I'm sure they would be happy to bring some of the capacity forward should the funds be available.
I have another question. The word “patient” was used a lot--patient-centred care, patient-centred outcomes, and so on. There is the issue of complementary and alternative practitioners being part of the continuity of care so that we don't have to be patients. I think a huge percentage of people use those services and stay away from being patients and stay out of hospitals, and that's not recognized as being an important preventative. From a health human resources perspective, what is being done, and is enough being done? I'd like your comment on bringing naturopathic physicians, traditional Chinese doctors, acupuncturists, homeopaths, and so on into primary care as part of the health human resources team. Do you see that being a priority? Do you think that's being adequately supported?